Laser Cutting Time Calculator

Estimate cutting, piercing, and setup time. Confirm the result with CAM or a timed sample cut.

Time Inputs

Total toolpath length from drawing or CAM

Use nesting utilization or a shop planning value

Estimated Total Cycle Time

8.61 min

Includes cutting time, pierce time, and setup time.

Cutting Speed

6.50 m/min

Cutting Time

0.37 min

Pierce Time

0.24 min

Setup Time

8.00 min

Time per Meter

3.59 min/m

Effective Output

200.91 m/hr

Assumptions to Review3 notes
  • - Cutting speed is a simplified reference estimate. Replace it with CAM or machine cut-chart values for formal quoting.
  • - Setup time is included separately so short jobs do not look artificially fast.
  • - Pierce time is included as pierce count multiplied by seconds per pierce.

Estimate laser cutting cycle time from cut length, material, thickness, laser power, pierce count, setup time, and utilization. Use this quick check when you need a cycle-time estimate before opening the full laser cutting cost calculator.

Confirm pierce count and setup minutes against CAM output or a timed sample cut so small jobs do not look artificially fast in the quote packet.

Best next step

Once the time estimate looks reasonable, carry the cutting length, pierce count, setup time, and shop assumptions into the detailed quote workflow.

How This Time Estimate Works

1. Cutting time

Cutting time equals total path length divided by estimated cutting speed.

2. Pierce time

Pierce time equals pierce count multiplied by seconds per pierce.

3. Setup time

Setup time is added separately so short runs and first-piece checks stay visible.

What this first-pass time tells you

The number is useful when a quote needs a quick sense of whether cutting, piercing, or setup is doing the damage. It gives the estimator a reason to investigate before promising a cycle.

Cutting path, pierces, and setup are kept as separate contributors so a short contour with many holes does not look like the same job as a long, simple cut. Read the result as a comparison between job scenarios, not as a machine promise.

The missing seconds are usually in acceleration, lead-ins, sequencing, handling, and the actual machine recipe. A CAM time or a timed run should take over when the quote matters.